NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs NVIDIA Quadro DCC
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 and NVIDIA Quadro DCC videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro DCC
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz vs 175 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm vs 180 nm |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 | NVIDIA Quadro DCC | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Celsius | Kelvin |
| Code name | Crush11 | NV20 A5 |
| Launch date | 4 June 2001 | 14 May 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 150 nm |
| Transistor count | 20 million | 57 million |
| Texture fill rate | 800 MTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 3.68 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 230 MHz | |
| Memory type | SDR | |
