NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs NVIDIA Quadro DCC

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 and NVIDIA Quadro DCC videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro DCC

  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 150 nm vs 180 nm
Core clock speed 200 MHz vs 175 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 150 nm vs 180 nm

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 NVIDIA Quadro DCC

Essentials

Architecture Celsius Kelvin
Code name Crush11 NV20 A5
Launch date 4 June 2001 14 May 2001
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Type Desktop Workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 175 MHz 200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 180 nm 150 nm
Transistor count 20 million 57 million
Texture fill rate 800 MTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface AGP 4x AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 7.0 8.0
OpenGL 1.2 1.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 3.68 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 230 MHz
Memory type SDR

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 with others

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 NVIDIA
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
vs ATI Radeon LE ATI
Radeon LE
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 NVIDIA
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
vs NVIDIA Quadro DCC NVIDIA
Quadro DCC
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 NVIDIA
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 NVIDIA
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420