NVIDIA H100 CNX vs AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA H100 CNX and AMD Radeon RX 6550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA H100 CNX
- 4.6x more texture fill rate: 841.3 GTexel/s vs 181.8 GTexel/s
- 14.3x more pipelines: 14592 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- 20x more maximum memory size: 80 GB vs 4 GB
Texture fill rate | 841.3 GTexel/s vs 181.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 14592 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
Maximum memory size | 80 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6550M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 690 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 2840 MHz vs 1845 MHz
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 22 Mar 2022 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 690 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2840 MHz vs 1845 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA H100 CNX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6550M
Name | NVIDIA H100 CNX | AMD Radeon RX 6550M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9605 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA H100 CNX | AMD Radeon RX 6550M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Hopper | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | GH100 | Navi 24 |
Launch date | 22 Mar 2022 | 4 Jan 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 208 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 2840 MHz |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 6 nm |
Pipelines | 14592 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.28 GPixel/s | 90.88 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 841.3 GTexel/s | 181.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 80000 million | 5400 million |
Compute units | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | None |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.2 |
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 80 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2,039 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 5120 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1593 MHz, 3.2 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | HBM2e | GDDR6 |