NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 550

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1100 MHz
  • Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1183 MHz
  • 3708.4x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
  • 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 476
  • 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 2690
  • 6.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 11610
  • 14.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 127
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2023 vs 18 April 2017
Core clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Boost clock speed 1755 MHz vs 1183 MHz
Texture fill rate 140.4 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 512
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 630 vs 476
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 vs 2690
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 vs 11610
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1788 vs 127

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
630
476
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14441
2690
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
74538
11610
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
1788
127
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G2D Mark 630 476
PassMark - G3D Mark 14441 2690
Geekbench - OpenCL 74538 11610
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1788 127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 52.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 140.911
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4485
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 940
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2158

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile AMD Radeon RX 550

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace GCN 4.0
Code name AD107 Lexa
Launch date 2023 18 April 2017
Place in performance rating 167 876
Design Radeon RX 500 Series
GCN generation 4th Gen
Launch price (MSRP) $79
Price now $75
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 59.51

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1755 MHz 1183 MHz
Core clock speed 1455 MHz 1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.986 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 512
Pixel fill rate 56.16 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 140.4 GTexel/s 37.86 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt
Floating-point performance 1.2 TFLOPs
Transistor count 2,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 145 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 400 Watt

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12
OpenCL 3.0 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 112 GB/s
Memory bus width 96 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 7000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Eyefinity
AMD Radeon™ Chill
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)