NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- 3708.4x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 630 vs 476
- 5.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 2690
- 6.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 11610
- 14.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1788 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 37.86 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 vs 476 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 2690 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 11610 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | 476 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | 2690 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | 11610 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 | 127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 940 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 940 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | AD107 | Lexa |
Launch date | 2023 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | 876 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |