NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1815 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 2023 vs 23 July 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1815 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- 6.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 23 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 110 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
