NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Texture fill rate | 141.1 GTexel/s vs 140.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 628 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14452 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74115 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8225 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD107 | AD107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 137 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 141.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.032 TFLOPS (1:1) | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.032 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 47.04 GPixel/s | 56.16 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 141.1 GTexel/s | 140.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 115 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |