NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and NVIDIA RTX A5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 2190 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 2430 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 220 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1070 vs 1036
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1070 vs 1036 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22900 vs 22861 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 8192 vs 4352
- 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154456 vs 130155
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 474.547
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 40.491
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1830.143
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 4352 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154456 vs 130155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 474.547 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 40.491 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 190.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1830.143 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA RTX A5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 130155 | 154456 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1070 | 1036 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22900 | 22861 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 581.432 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | 54.372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 191.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 2038.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 6836.931 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD106 | GA102 |
Launch date | 2023 | 12 Apr 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 70 | 71 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 1170 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4352 | 8192 |
Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 162.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 433.9 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |