NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 4352 vs 3840
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 129876 vs 101679
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22746 vs 19762
- Around 27% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2911 vs 2299
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 474.547 vs 311.253
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.491 vs 33.932
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.736 vs 169.697
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1830.143 vs 1500.926
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4352 vs 3840 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129876 vs 101679 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22746 vs 19762 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 vs 2299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 vs 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 vs 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 vs 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 vs 1500.926 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2190 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2430 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 316.8 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1085 vs 1078
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2190 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2430 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 316.8 GTexel/s vs 311.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1085 vs 1078 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 129876 | 101679 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1078 | 1085 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22746 | 19762 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 | 2299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 474.547 | 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.491 | 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.736 | 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1830.143 | 1500.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD106 | AD106 |
Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 70 | 73 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2430 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2190 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 330.5 GFLOPS (1:64) | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.15 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4352 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 155.5 GPixel/s | 126.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 311.0 GTexel/s | 316.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 200 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |