NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and ATI Radeon 9200 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 22 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 7x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 305.1x more texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 800 MTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 150 nm
- 128x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 64 MB
- 6x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 332 MHz
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 759 vs 129
- 6528.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19586 vs 3
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s vs 800 MTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 332 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 vs 129 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19586 vs 3 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 SE
- 4.1x lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 SE
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | ATI Radeon 9200 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 759 | 129 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19586 | 3 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109087 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2701 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 319.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 36.174 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1585.54 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | ATI Radeon 9200 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Rage 7 |
Code name | AD106 | RV280 |
Launch date | 2023 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 80 | 1265 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 150 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.62 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4608 | |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 800 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 36 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 8.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 2.656 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 332 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR |