Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 319.688
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 36.174
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 1585.54
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 319.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 36.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 1585.54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 758 vs 717
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19562 vs 12308
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2701 vs 2611
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109023 vs 97728
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 140.823
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Oct 2022 |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3584 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 758 vs 717 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19562 vs 12308 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2701 vs 2611 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109023 vs 97728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 140.823 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 758 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12308 | 19562 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2611 | 2701 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97728 | 109023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 319.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 36.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 218.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 1585.54 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | DG2-512 | AD106 |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 78 | 80 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A750 with others
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7700S
IntelArc A750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600 XT
