Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A750
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 537.6 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 528.023 vs 319.688
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 37.29 vs 36.174
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1972.437 vs 1585.54
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 vs 319.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 vs 36.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 vs 1585.54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3584
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 6 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 762 vs 688
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19568 vs 12025
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 12488 vs 12415
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107581 vs 97097
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 218.946 vs 140.823
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Oct 2022 |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 3584 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 6 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 762 vs 688 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 vs 12025 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12488 vs 12415 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 107581 vs 97097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 218.946 vs 140.823 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 688 | 762 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12025 | 19568 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12415 | 12488 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97097 | 107581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 528.023 | 319.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6333.285 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 37.29 | 36.174 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.823 | 218.946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1972.437 | 1585.54 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A750 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | DG2-512 | AD106 |
| Launch date | 12 Oct 2022 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | 82 | 79 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.62 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.20 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 268.8 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 537.6 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 21700 million | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 244.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A750 with others
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
IntelArc A750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 4GB
IntelArc A750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
IntelArc A750 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 XT
