NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 285 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 1060
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 26668
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 191142
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 690.619
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 62.614
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 209.424
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 2441.384
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 1060 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 26668 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 191142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 690.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 62.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 2441.384 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 37% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 7680
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5118 vs 5024
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 10496 vs 7680 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5118 vs 5024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 1060 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 26668 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | 5118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 191142 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | 690.619 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | 62.614 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | 209.424 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | 2441.384 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD104 | GA102 |
| Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 1 Sep 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 8 | 46 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 7680 | 10496 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
