NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1626 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 2610 MHz vs 2491 MHz
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 480.2 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 5888 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1166 vs 882
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26959 vs 15097
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 168049 vs 73020
- 2.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3854 vs 1492
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 417.133 vs 260.061
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 55.476 vs 20.421
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2459.317 vs 1152.228
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 13 Oct 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1626 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz vs 2491 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 5888 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1166 vs 882 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26959 vs 15097 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 vs 73020 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3854 vs 1492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 417.133 vs 260.061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.476 vs 20.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2459.317 vs 1152.228 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 290.312 vs 245.639
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 285 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 vs 245.639 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1166 | 882 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 26959 | 15097 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 168049 | 73020 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3854 | 1492 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 417.133 | 260.061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 55.476 | 20.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 245.639 | 290.312 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2459.317 | 1152.228 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Code name | AD104 | Navi 23 XL |
| Launch date | 2023 | 13 Oct 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 35 | 38 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 480.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 30.74 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5888 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 167.0 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 480.2 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Transistor count | 35800 million | 11060 million |
| Compute units | 28 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Height | 61 mm, 2.4 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 336 mm, 13.2 inches | 190 mm (7.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 140 mm, 5.5 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
NVIDIATesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6950 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
NVIDIARTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 GRE
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
