NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 3.3x more core clock speed: 2205 MHz vs 675 MHz
  • 20145.5x more texture fill rate: 761.5 GTexel/s vs 37.8 GTexel / s
  • 29x more pipelines: 9728 vs 336
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 40 nm
  • 21.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 768 MB
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1236 vs 388
  • 15.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 34500 vs 2272
  • 30.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 240557 vs 7860
  • 33.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 722.769 vs 21.445
  • 39.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 72.795 vs 1.823
  • 10x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 272.641 vs 27.222
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 vs 12 July 2010
Core clock speed 2205 MHz vs 675 MHz
Texture fill rate 761.5 GTexel/s vs 37.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 9728 vs 336
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 768 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1236 vs 388
PassMark - G3D Mark 34500 vs 2272
Geekbench - OpenCL 240557 vs 7860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 722.769 vs 21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 72.795 vs 1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 272.641 vs 27.222

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 320 Watt
  • 2.6x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 160 Watt vs 320 Watt
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1236
388
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
34500
2272
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
240557
7860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
722.769
21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
72.795
1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
272.641
27.222
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 1236 388
PassMark - G3D Mark 34500 2272
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6567 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 240557 7860
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 722.769 21.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 72.795 1.823
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 272.641 27.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 617.847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.61
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Fermi
Code name AD103 GF104
Launch date 20 Sep 2022 12 July 2010
Place in performance rating 14 917
Launch price (MSRP) $229
Price now $89.99
Type Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 34.71

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2505 MHz
Core clock speed 2205 MHz 675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 761.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 48.74 TFLOPS
Pipelines 9728 336
Pixel fill rate 280.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 761.5 GTexel/s 37.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 320 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 45900 million 1,950 million
Floating-point performance 907.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Triple-slot
Height 61 mm, 2.4 inches 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 310 mm, 12.2 inches 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 700 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 16-pin 6-pin & 6-pin
Width 140 mm, 5.5 inches
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.1
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 768 MB
Memory bandwidth 716.8 GB/s 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz, 22.4 Gbps effective 3600 MHz
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI