NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1075 MHz
- 1568.2x more texture fill rate: 276.0 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec
- 2.1x more pipelines: 5888 vs 2816
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- 285.7x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
Launch date | 2022 vs 2 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1075 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s vs 176 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 5888 vs 2816 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 vs 278
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13811 vs 6644
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 854 vs 278 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13811 vs 6644 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 278 | 854 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6644 | 13811 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 145.843 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.98 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.661 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.16 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 788.464 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10471 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5757 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GA104 | GM200 |
Launch date | 2022 | 2 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 299 | 297 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $679.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.43 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1075 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 552.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 5888 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 120.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s | 176 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 8,000 million |
CUDA cores | 2816 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,060 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin + 8-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 336.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |