NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 276.0 GTexel/s vs 259.4 GTexel/s
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Launch date | 2022 vs 4 Jan 2022 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s vs 259.4 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 492
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17813 vs 7141
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 492 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17813 vs 7141 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 492 | 784 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7141 | 17813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 106315 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA104 | GA104 |
| Launch date | 2022 | 4 Jan 2022 |
| Place in performance rating | 185 | 102 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 552.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 259.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 17.66 TFLOPS | 16.60 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 5888 | 5888 |
| Pixel fill rate | 120.0 GPixel/s | 135.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 276.0 GTexel/s | 259.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
