NVIDIA RTX A5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5500

357.3x more texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
3.5x lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 800 Watt
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective

Texture fill rate	532.8 GTexel/s vs 1,491 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	230 Watt vs 800 Watt
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
2.2x more core clock speed: 2355 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 2625 MHz vs 1665 MHz
Around 78% higher pipelines: 18176 vs 10240
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 24 GB

Launch date	2023 vs 22 Mar 2022
Core clock speed	2355 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Boost clock speed	2625 MHz vs 1665 MHz
Pipelines	18176 vs 10240
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 8 nm
Maximum memory size	48 GB vs 24 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

Name	NVIDIA RTX A5500	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	918
PassMark - G3D Mark	21872
Geekbench - OpenCL	174637

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A5500	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Code name	GA102	AD102
Launch date	22 Mar 2022	2023
Place in performance rating	29	not rated
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2625 MHz
Core clock speed	1080 MHz	2355 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	1,066 GFLOPS (1:32)	1,491 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	34.10 TFLOPS (1:1)	95.42 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	34.10 TFLOPS	95.42 TFLOPS
Pipelines	10240	18176
Pixel fill rate	159.8 GPixel/s	504.0 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	532.8 GTexel/s	1,491 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	230 Watt	800 Watt
Transistor count	28300 million	76300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot	Triple-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm, 10.5 inches	336 mm, 13.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt	1200 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 16-pin
Width	112 mm, 4.4 inches	140 mm, 5.5 inches
Height		61 mm, 2.4 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	48 GB
Memory bandwidth	768.0 GB/s	1,152 GB/s
Memory bus width	384 bit	384 bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective	1500 MHz, 24 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X