NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 3.7x more boost clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 8680x more texture fill rate: 78.12 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 44.8x more pipelines: 896 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Name | NVIDIA T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37713 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 171 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Curie |
Code name | TU117 | G71 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 18 April 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 595 | 593 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz | 375 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 375 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 90 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 78.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.500 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 896 | 20 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |