NVIDIA T400 4GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 420 MHz vs 384
- 929.3x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 479
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 2360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz vs 384 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 vs 479 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 vs 2360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 | 479 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 | 2360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | TU117 | GF104 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 262 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,950 million |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 96.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |