NVIDIA T400 4GB vs ATI FirePro RG220
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 4GB and ATI FirePro RG220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 8550x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 652 vs 552
- 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3758 vs 335
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 1 May 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 vs 552 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3758 vs 335 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro RG220
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400 4GB
GPU 2: ATI FirePro RG220
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 4GB | ATI FirePro RG220 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 652 | 552 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3758 | 335 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17217 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 4GB | ATI FirePro RG220 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU117 | RV711 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 1 May 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 261 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 242 million |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |