NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 3570.8x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2496 vs 768
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5089 vs 3368
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5089 vs 3368 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2015 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 275 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 275 | 708 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5089 | 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.948 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 874.689 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.11 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4620 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Saturn |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 350 | 351 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 2,080 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |