NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 1572.5x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1664
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 179x more memory clock speed: 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
| Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 vs 19 September 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2496 vs 1664 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 824 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 280
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 4680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 824 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 766 vs 280 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9640 vs 4680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | 766 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 | 9640 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 369 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GK210 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 19 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 374 | 371 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Price now | $407.76 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2496 | 1664 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 148 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7100 million | 5,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1664 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 500 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

