NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Around 95% higher pipelines: 2496 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
Pipelines | 2496 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 94% higher core clock speed: 1088 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 824 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 280
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6366 vs 4680
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1088 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 vs 280 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6366 vs 4680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | 404 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 | 6366 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25862 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK210 | N17E-Q1 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 374 | 377 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1088 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 168 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |