NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 8927.1x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 19.2 billion / sec
- 39x more pipelines: 2496 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 57% higher memory clock speed: 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz
- 7.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4680 vs 636
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 vs 15 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 19.2 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 vs 636 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 562 MHz
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 280
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 vs 280 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800S
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | 427 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4680 | 636 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GK210 | G94 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 15 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 374 | 380 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 64 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 19.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | VGAHDMISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |