NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA T400 4GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA T400 4GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 562 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 6.5x more pipelines: 2496 vs 384
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5852 vs 3760
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2496 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 vs 3760 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400 4GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 824 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 653 vs 374
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 653 vs 374 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA T400 4GB
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA T400 4GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 653 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | 3760 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17217 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA T400 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GK210 | TU117 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 6 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 259 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1425 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 420 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | 1,094 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2496 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | 22.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 34.20 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 4700 million |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 200 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | 6.7 (6.4) |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 80.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |