NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 517x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2496
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1408 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective
Launch date | 5 April 2016 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1328 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2496 |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1408 MHz vs 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | GK210 | GP100 |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 5 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 256 | 255 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1328 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 15,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 1408 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |