NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80 and AMD Radeon R9 Nano videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80
- 669.5x more texture fill rate: 171.4 GTexel/s vs 256.0 GTexel / s
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s vs 256.0 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 64% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2496
- Around 71% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 17 Nov 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2496 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5852 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4579 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 | AMD Radeon R9 Nano | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Fiji |
Launch date | 17 Nov 2014 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 259 | 261 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,371 GFLOPS (1:3) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.113 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2496 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.85 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 171.4 GTexel/s | 256.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 175 Watt |
Transistor count | 7100 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 8,192 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 152 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 (5.1) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz, 5 Gbps effective | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |