NVIDIA NX-SoC vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NX-SoC and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NX-SoC
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 384 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 768 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 42.12 GTexel / s vs 12.29 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,348 gflops vs 393.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 20 nm
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 384 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 768 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 42.12 GTexel / s vs 12.29 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 256 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,348 gflops vs 393.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 20 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NX-SoC
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile
| Name | NVIDIA NX-SoC | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2086 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6882 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5180 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5180 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA NX-SoC | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GM20B | Baffin |
| Launch date | 17 March 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 494 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 768 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 384 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 393.2 gflops | 1,348 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 20 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.29 GTexel / s | 42.12 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 112.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |