NVIDIA NX-SoC vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA NX-SoC and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NX-SoC
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1002 MHz vs 384 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1053 MHz vs 768 MHz
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 58.97 GTexel / s vs 12.29 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 896 vs 256
- 4.8x better floating-point performance: 1,887 gflops vs 393.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 20 nm
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
Core clock speed | 1002 MHz vs 384 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz vs 768 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 GTexel / s vs 12.29 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops vs 393.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 20 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA NX-SoC
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Name | NVIDIA NX-SoC | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2642 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2086 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3301 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2086 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA NX-SoC | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM20B | Baffin |
Launch date | 17 March 2017 | 1 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 671 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 768 MHz | 1053 MHz |
Core clock speed | 384 MHz | 1002 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 393.2 gflops | 1,887 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 20 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 12.29 GTexel / s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 112.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |