NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 79% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 14.3x more texture fill rate: 20 GTexel / s vs 1.4 GTexel / s
• 48x more pipelines: 192 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
• 5.2x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 23.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 40
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 222
• 13.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 197
• 13.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 197

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	947 40
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 222
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2668 197
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2668 197

Compare specifications (specs)