NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
  • Around 25% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 636
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 128
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 2172
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 2172
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 24 December 2010 vs 1 February 2010
Pipelines 192 vs 128
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 62 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 947 vs 636
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2668 vs 2172
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2668 vs 2172

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 38 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
947
636
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
301
128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2668
2172
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2668
2172
Name NVIDIA Quadro 2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
PassMark - G3D Mark 947 636
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 128
Geekbench - OpenCL 3902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2668 2172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2668 2172

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi Tesla
Code name GF106 G92
Launch date 24 December 2010 1 February 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Place in performance rating 1290 1292
Price now $87.99
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 17.65

Technical info

Core clock speed 625 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 192 128
Texture fill rate 20 GTexel / s 38 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 62 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1,170 million 754 million
CUDA cores 128
Gigaflops 576

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 178 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB / s 61 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
Power management 8.0