NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 192 vs 128
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 636
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 128
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2668 vs 2172
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2668 vs 2172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 vs 1 February 2010 |
Pipelines | 192 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 vs 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 vs 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 vs 2172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 38 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion / sec vs 20 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 | 636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2668 | 2172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2668 | 2172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
Code name | GF106 | G92 |
Launch date | 24 December 2010 | 1 February 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Place in performance rating | 1290 | 1292 |
Price now | $87.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | 38 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Gigaflops | 576 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Single Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 178 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | 61 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |