AMD Radeon HD 7640G vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 7640G and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7640G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2245 vs 1682
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2245 vs 1682
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2668
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 vs 24 December 2010 |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2245 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2245 vs 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2668 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 497 MHz
- 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3879 vs 1188
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1600 vs 636
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1600 vs 636
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 303 vs 123
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 947 vs 456
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz vs 497 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3879 vs 1188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1600 vs 636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1600 vs 636 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 vs 123 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 947 vs 456 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 7640G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 7640G | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1188 | 3879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 636 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 636 | 1600 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2245 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2245 | 1682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2668 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 123 | 303 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 456 | 947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.229 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 258.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.688 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.02 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon HD 7640G | NVIDIA Quadro 2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Terascale 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Trinity | GF106 |
| Launch date | 15 May 2012 | 24 December 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1286 | 1287 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Price now | $87.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.65 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 686 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 497 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 20 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
