NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 4000M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 445 MHz
14.9x more texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 1.78 GTexel / s
84x more pipelines: 336 vs 4
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
5x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 500 MHz
30.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1328 vs 43
Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 226
5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1254 vs 252
5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1254 vs 252

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	22 February 2011 vs 19 January 2006
Core clock speed	475 MHz vs 445 MHz
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s vs 1.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	336 vs 4
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 90 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 128 MB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1328 vs 43
PassMark - G2D Mark	275 vs 226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254 vs 252
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254 vs 252

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1400

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1328

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

275

226

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

252

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

252

Name	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
PassMark - G3D Mark	1328	43
PassMark - G2D Mark	275	226
Geekbench - OpenCL	5141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1254	252
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1254	252

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro 4000M	ATI Mobility Radeon X1400
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi	R500
Code name	GF104	M54
Launch date	22 February 2011	19 January 2006
Launch price (MSRP)	$449
Place in performance rating	1283	1285
Price now	$111.99
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	19.30
Technical info
Core clock speed	475 MHz	445 MHz
Floating-point performance	638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Pipelines	336	4
Texture fill rate	26.6 GTexel / s	1.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,950 million	107 million
Boost clock speed		445 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	9.0c
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Memory bandwidth	80.0 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	250 Bit
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz	500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128
Shared memory	0	0