AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 475 MHz
• Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5862 vs 5212
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1413
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 865
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1254
• Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1413
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 865
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

• Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1270 vs 1012
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 265 vs 203
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.42 vs 8.274
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 271.177
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 1.505
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 24.834
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 vs 70.596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1012 1270
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	203 265
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5862 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.274 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	271.177 738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.505 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.834 33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.596 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1734 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 1254

Compare specifications (specs)