AMD Radeon HD 8750M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8750M and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8750M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 31% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 475 MHz
  • Around 14% higher pipelines: 384 vs 336
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5747 vs 5212
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1734 vs 1413
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2221 vs 865
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1254
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1734 vs 1413
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2221 vs 865
  • 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1254
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 February 2013 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed 620 MHz vs 475 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 336
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 5747 vs 5212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1734 vs 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1734 vs 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 vs 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

  • Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 7% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1302 vs 1009
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 273 vs 203
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.42 vs 8.274
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 271.177
  • Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 1.505
  • Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 24.834
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 vs 70.596
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 26.6 GTexel / s vs 18.6 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 638.4 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1302 vs 1009
PassMark - G2D Mark 273 vs 203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 21.42 vs 8.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 738.724 vs 271.177
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.068 vs 1.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 33.126 vs 24.834
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 81.823 vs 70.596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1009
1302
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
203
273
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
5747
5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.274
21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
271.177
738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.505
2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.834
33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
70.596
81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1734
1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1734
1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
1254
Name AMD Radeon HD 8750M NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1009 1302
PassMark - G2D Mark 203 273
Geekbench - OpenCL 5747 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.274 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 271.177 738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.505 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.834 33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.596 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1734 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1734 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 1254
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon HD 8750M NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Mars GF104
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series
Launch date 26 February 2013 22 February 2011
Place in performance rating 1300 1302
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $449
Price now $111.99
Value for money (0-100) 19.30

Technical info

Boost clock speed 775 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 620 MHz 475 MHz
Floating-point performance 595.2 gflops 638.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 336
Texture fill rate 18.6 GTexel / s 26.6 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1,040 million 1,950 million
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized large

API support

DirectX 11 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.4 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 64 GB / s 80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 2500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0