NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 640 MHz vs 475 MHz
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
- 7x better floating-point performance: 245.76 gflops vs 35.2 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 13 December 2010 vs 12 October 2009 |
Core clock speed | 640 MHz vs 475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s vs 3.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops vs 35.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 526 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2100 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.617 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 185.752 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.526 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.137 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1255 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2037 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1255 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2037 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 600 | NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GT216 |
Launch date | 13 December 2010 | 12 October 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Place in performance rating | 1471 | not rated |
Price now | $299 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 245.76 gflops | 35.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 10.24 GTexel / s | 3.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 168 mm | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR2 |