NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs ATI Radeon 9500
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M and ATI Radeon 9500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 150 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 64 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 87 vs 36
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 vs 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 173 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9500
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 17 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9500
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | ATI Radeon 9500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 | 36 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | ATI Radeon 9500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 8 |
Code name | G86 | R300 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 987 | 989 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 12 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 110 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 17.28 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 540 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 |