NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- Around 56% better floating-point performance: 40 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 87
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 40 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 vs 87 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 20 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 20 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 | 87 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G96 | G86 |
Launch date | 3 June 2008 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 984 | 985 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 400 MHz |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 40 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 4 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 314 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
PCI-E 2.0 | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |