NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 9.8x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 29.4x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 19.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 87
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 308
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1027
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1027
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 vs 87 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 1027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 1027 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 | 87 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 308 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4930 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 1027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 1027 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G86 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 985 | 988 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 17 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
