NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 9.8x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 29.4x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 19.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1687 vs 87
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 308
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1027
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1027
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 9 May 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1687 vs 87 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 vs 308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 1027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 1027 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1687 | 87 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 | 308 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4968 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 1027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 1027 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G86 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 9 May 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 984 | 987 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 17 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9500M G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon Pro 555X
