NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M and NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 256 MB vs 32 MB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 87 vs 51
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 171
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 February 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 256 MB vs 32 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 vs 51 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 171 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 400 MHz
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 | 51 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 171 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rankine |
Code name | G86 | NV36 A1 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 988 | 989 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | |
Transistor count | 210 million | 82 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 32 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 8.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 550 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 |