ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Comparative analysis of ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v and NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 720 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 5.76 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 80 vs 16
- 4.5x better floating-point performance: 115.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 17 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 200 vs 87
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1844 vs 1027
- Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1844 vs 1027
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2010 vs 9 May 2007 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.76 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 80 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 115.2 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 17 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 200 vs 87 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1844 vs 1027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1844 vs 1027 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 270
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 270 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 200 | 87 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 270 | 308 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1844 | 1027 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1844 | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla |
Code name | M92 | G86 |
Launch date | 5 May 2010 | 9 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 987 | 988 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 115.2 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 80 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.76 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 242 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 |