NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M and ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 130 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 63 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1120 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 87 vs 81
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 308 vs 170
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 March 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 63 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1120 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 vs 170 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 520 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 8.32 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 520 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.32 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 87 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | 170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1027 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1027 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M | ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
Code name | G86 | R423 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 March 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 988 | 991 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 520 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 25.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | 8.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 63 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 9.6 GB / s | 35.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 7.0 |