NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP and NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 75 vs 39
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 15 June 2009 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 vs 39 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
- 2x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 550 MHz
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 105.6 gflops vs 44 gflops
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 28 Watt
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 212 vs 123
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1727 vs 1023
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1727 vs 1023
- Around 98% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5644 vs 2855
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 105.6 gflops vs 44 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 212 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1727 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1727 vs 1023 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5644 vs 2855 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 123 | 212 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | 39 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1023 | 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1023 | 1727 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2855 | 5644 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT218 | GT216 |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Place in performance rating | 1599 | 1600 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44 gflops | 105.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 486 million |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Gigaflops | 158 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | Dual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | HDA | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |