NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP and NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 550 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 75 vs 37
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 vs 14 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 vs 37 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 82% better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 44 gflops
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 221 vs 123
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1640 vs 1023
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1640 vs 1023
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 44 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 221 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1640 vs 1023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1640 vs 1023 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 123 | 221 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 75 | 37 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1023 | 1640 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1023 | 1640 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2855 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP | NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G96 |
Launch date | 1 December 2009 | 14 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | $527 |
Place in performance rating | 1600 | 1603 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $527 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 0.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 44 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.4 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
PowerMizer 8.0 |