NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 62% higher core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 375 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 4.85 GTexel / s vs 4.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 130 nm
- 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 142 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 121 vs 101
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 vs 78
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 1 April 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 606 MHz vs 375 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s vs 4.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 130 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 142 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 vs 101 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | 101 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 78 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2851 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Curie |
| Code name | GT218 | NV40 A1 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 1 April 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 1493 | 1496 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 375 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Pipelines | 16 | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 4.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x Molex | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
