NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 vs 74
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 15 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 606 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 vs 74 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
- Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 32 vs 16
- Around 70% better floating-point performance: 80 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 122 vs 121
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 32 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops vs 46.98 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 122 vs 121 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 74 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2851 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2058 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G96C |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1493 | 1494 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |