NVIDIA Quadro K4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K4000 and NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 540 MHz
- 6x more texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec
- 24x more pipelines: 768 vs 32
- 16.3x better floating-point performance: 1,244 gflops vs 76.16 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
- 8x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 20.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2721 vs 131
- 10.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 424 vs 42
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 1397
- 8.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 449
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 1397
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 vs 17 April 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s vs 8.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops vs 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2721 vs 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 vs 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 vs 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 vs 1397 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
- Around 70% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2721 | 131 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 424 | 42 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6674 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 427.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.899 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.965 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3321 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3798 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 | 449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3321 | 1397 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK106 | G84 |
| Launch date | 1 March 2013 | 17 April 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,269 | $159 |
| Place in performance rating | 866 | 1621 |
| Price now | $225.65 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,244 gflops | 76.16 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 GTexel / s | 8.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 289 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | 170 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 134.8 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5616 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 256 MB | |
Technologies |
||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7800
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2300
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
NVIDIAQuadro K4000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
