AMD Radeon R9 M380 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M380 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M380

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,536 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2765 vs 2720
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 423
• Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12565 vs 6666
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.701 vs 18.462
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 546.907 vs 427.88
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.618 vs 1.899
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 48.878 vs 23.742
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 194.051 vs 61.965

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
• 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1500 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 3688
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 536
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3321 vs 2855
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 3688
• 6.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 536
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 2855

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M380
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2765 2720
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	509 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12565 6666
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	34.701 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	546.907 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.618 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	48.878 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	194.051 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3688 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2855 3321

Compare specifications (specs)