NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs ATI Radeon X300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and ATI Radeon X300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

ATI Radeon X300

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 11 month(s) later
2.6x more core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 375 MHz
21.2x more texture fill rate: 31.78 GTexel / s vs 1.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
12.5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 400 MHz
69.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2854 vs 41
Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 209

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 1 September 2004
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 375 MHz
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s vs 1.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 110 nm
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2854 vs 41
PassMark - G2D Mark	307 vs 209

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X300

Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 36 Watt vs 40 Watt
32x more maximum memory size: 64 MB vs 2 GB / 4 GB

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	36 Watt vs 40 Watt
Maximum memory size	64 MB vs 2 GB / 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X300

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2854

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

209

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	ATI Radeon X300
PassMark - G3D Mark	2854	41
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	209
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	ATI Radeon X300
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Rage 9
Code name	GM107	RV370
Launch date	18 August 2015	1 September 2004
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	848	845
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	375 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	110 nm
Pipelines	512
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	1.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	36 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	107 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	9.0
OpenGL	4.5	2.0
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	64 MB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	6.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus