NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and NVIDIA Quadro K4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 65% higher core clock speed: 993 MHz vs 601 MHz
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2854 vs 1915
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 298
Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 5827
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 vs 10.054
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 vs 544.601
2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 vs 1.46
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 vs 22.103
3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 vs 36.553
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3855
Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3855

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 1 June 2012
Core clock speed	993 MHz vs 601 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 2800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2854 vs 1915
PassMark - G2D Mark	307 vs 298
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33 vs 10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18 vs 544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056 vs 1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938 vs 22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786 vs 36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3855

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

Around 51% higher texture fill rate: 48.08 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
Around 13% better floating-point performance: 1,154 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4957 vs 3716
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4470 vs 3358
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4957 vs 3716
Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4470 vs 3358

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.08 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 512
Floating-point performance	1,154 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	4957 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4470 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	4957 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4470 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2854

1915

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

307

298

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8849

5827

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

38.33

10.054

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

721.18

544.601

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.056

1.46

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42.938

22.103

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

137.786

36.553

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3855

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

4957

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

4470

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4196

3855

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3716

4957

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

4470

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2854	1915
PassMark - G2D Mark	307	298
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849	5827
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	38.33	10.054
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	721.18	544.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.056	1.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	42.938	22.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	137.786	36.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196	3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716	4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	4470
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196	3855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716	4957
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	4470
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M	NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	GK104
Launch date	18 August 2015	1 June 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$200.89
Place in performance rating	848	851
Price now	$203.37
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Value for money (0-100)	16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	993 MHz	601 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,017 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	960
Texture fill rate	31.78 GTexel / s	48.08 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB / 4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	89.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus