AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 993 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 57.6 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 2,150 gflops vs 1,017 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2048x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.281 vs 38.33
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.276 vs 721.18
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.951 vs 3.056
- Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.944 vs 42.938
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 196.307 vs 137.786
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5269 vs 4196
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5269 vs 4196
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s vs 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops vs 1,017 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 vs 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 vs 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 vs 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 vs 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 vs 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 vs 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 vs 4196 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2344
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2344
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.281 | 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.276 | 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.951 | 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.944 | 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 196.307 | 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5269 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2344 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5269 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2344 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2847 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Baffin | GM107 |
Launch date | 27 September 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 850 | 851 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Price now | $203.37 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz | 993 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,150 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 57.6 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |