NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 425 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 144.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3463 vs 24
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 339 vs 265
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 vs 22 December 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3463 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 vs 265 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 55 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3463 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | 265 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8148 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 47.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 782.113 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.5 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.048 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 171.268 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Curie |
Code name | GM107 | MCP51 |
Launch date | 3 December 2015 | 22 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 702 | 640 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1098 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 43.92 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |