NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1098 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Around 1% better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 60 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 47.281 vs 42.463
Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 782.113 vs 642.715
Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.5 vs 2.933
Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.048 vs 26.532
Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 171.268 vs 133.458
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4920 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4920 vs 4843
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	3 December 2015 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 1020 MHz
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt vs 60 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5 vs 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.268 vs 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920 vs 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715 vs 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 3466
Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 340
Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11325 vs 8148

Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3904 vs 3466
PassMark - G2D Mark	512 vs 340
Geekbench - OpenCL	11325 vs 8148

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3466

3904

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

340

512

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

8148

11325

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

47.281

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

782.113

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.5

2.933

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

51.048

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

171.268

133.458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4920

4843

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3329

Name	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	3466	3904
PassMark - G2D Mark	340	512
Geekbench - OpenCL	8148	11325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	47.281	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	782.113	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.5	2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	51.048	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	171.268	133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4920	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4920	4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1265

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro M2000M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell
Code name	GM107	GM107
Launch date	3 December 2015	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	701	703
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1098 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	640
Texture fill rate	43.92 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	55 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Shader Model	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	80 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA